Legal Opinion
Bauman v. Royal Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided October 23, 1961PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Jacobs, J.
The Appellate Division affirmed the trial court’s judgment of dismissal which was entered at the close of the plaintiff’s case. See Bauman v. Royal Indem. Co., 66 N. J. Super. 110 (1961). We granted certification on application pursuant to R. R. 1:10-2. 34 N. J. 474 (1961).
The plaintiff lives in West Orange, New Jersey and has lived there for many years. He testified that before he moved there he went to Erenkel & Co. in New York City and “requested from them every type of insurance that was necessary to cover myself on my house, any people…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hay v. . Star Fire Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Laurice v. Cox v. Esso Shipping CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Singer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Kimble v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Morrissey v. PowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Sears Mortgage Corp. v. RoseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Spagnola v. Chubb Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Aden v. FortshSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Ellmex Const. Co., Inc. v. Republic Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Countryside Oil Co. v. Travelers InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.