Legal Opinion

Bellavance v. Frank Morrow Co.

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided March 13, 1943No. Civil Action No. 104PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTIGAN, District Judge.

This suit was for the infringement of Claims 1 and 2 of the Bellavance Patent No. 2,108,247, patented February IS, 1938, for a bracelet and method of making the same and Claims 1 and 2 of the Manickas Patent No. 2,114,930, patented April 19, 1938, relating to a bracelet. The Manickas patent was assigned on April 16, 1941, to Bellavance.

The defendant denies the validity and also the infringement of the patents in suit.

The Bellavance Patent No. 2,108,247 claims are:

1. “A bracelet structure comprising two or more longitudinally curved sections having lateral flanges…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Locomotive Engine Safety Truck Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Electric Cable Joint Co. v. Brooklyn Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Forstner Chain Corp. v. Marvel Jewelry Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949
  2. McComb v. Hunt Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API