Legal Opinion

McComb v. Hunt Foods, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 14, 1948No. 11685PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BONE, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court in an action under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. The facts and the legal issues involved are fully discussed in the opinion of the lower court.1

The issues here are clearly and concisely presented in the briefs of the parties. Appellant says the question is

“Whether the defendant’s operations with respect to apple peelings and cores received from dehydrating plants constitute ‘the first processing of * * * fresh fruits’ either (1) within the meaning of the Administrator’s regulation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walling v. California Conserving Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1945
  2. McComb v. C. H. Musselman Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Bellavance v. Frank Morrow Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1943

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Dong Yi and Edgar Martinez, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Sterling Collision Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  2. Waialua Agr. Co., Limited v. Maneja Maneja v. Waialua Agr. Co., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  3. McComb v. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  4. Mitchell v. Oregon Frozen Foods Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1956
  5. Waialua Agricultural Co., Limited v. ManejaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API