Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Railroad v. Locomotive Engine Safety Truck Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 3, 1884No. 44PublishedCited by 166 opinions

APPEAL EROM THE CIBCUIT COUBT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP PENNSYLVANIA. Suit in equity for alleged infringement of letters patent for an improvement in trucks for locomotives by the employment of pilot wheels to allow of lateral motion to the engine. The defence was: 1st. Public use for more than two years before the patentee’s application; 2d. Want of novelty.

Read the full summary

APPEAL EROM THE CIBCUIT COUBT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP PENNSYLVANIA. Suit in equity for alleged infringement of letters patent for an improvement in trucks for locomotives by the employment of pilot wheels to allow of lateral motion to the engine. The defence was: 1st. Public use for more than two years before the patentee’s application; 2d. Want of novelty. The court below found that the invention had been in use on cars prior to the patent, but not as applied to locomotives, and a decree was entered sustaining the patent, from which the defendant below appealed

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

This is an appeal by the defendant below from a decree against it upon a bill in equity for the infringement of letters patent granted on February 11th, 1862, to Alba F. Smith, for an improvement in trucks for locomotive engines, the specification annexed to which, except the drawings and the letters referring to them and the formal .beginning and conclusion, was as follows

“ Several laterally moving trucks have heretofore been made and applied to railroad cars. My invention does not relaté broadly to such laterally moving trueks ; but my said invention consists' in the employment, in a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  3. Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Smith v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by166 opinions

  1. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Thompson v. BoisselierSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. McCarty v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API