Forstner Chain Corp. v. Marvel Jewelry Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MAGRUDER, Chief Judge.
No. 4425 presents an unusual situation. The appeal is from a ruling or order denying a motion to enter final judgment dismissing a complaint in a patent suit, this motion having been made by the losing plaintiff, Forstner Chain Corporation, on the theory that the granting of such motion was a prerequisite to the taking of an appeal. At first blush, an order of this sort might seem not to be a “final decision” appealable under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291. Under the special circumstances, which we shall summarize below, we hold that the order is a “final decision”. However, on the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Parker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946
- Loeb v. Columbia Township TrusteesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- United States v. HarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Commissioner v. Estate of BedfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Ekberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Powe v. MilesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Antonio Paliaga v. Luckenbach Steamship Company, and Third-Party v. Turner & Blanchard, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Richard C. Fiore v. Washington County Community Mental Health CenterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Powe v. MilesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.