Legal Opinion

Underwood v. Tew

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1893No. 916PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from, Superior Court, Chehdlis Cou/ni/y.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, J.

The plaintiff, appellant here, brought this action to recover the aggregate amount of three promissory notes executed by the defendant to plaintiff on May 31, 1883, at Big Rapids, Michigan, for §2,000, §2,250 and §2,250, respectively, with' interest at seven per cent, per annum,, and due two, three and four years, respectively, after date. The complaint is in the usual form in like actions, and judgment is therein demanded for §6,500, and interest at the rate above mentioned. The defendant, in his answer, admitted the making of the notes, but…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eddy v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Beecher v. . ConradtNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  3. Bohall v. DillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Glassell v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. McCroskey v. LaddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Tucker v. ThravesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Gibson v. RouseWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Stevens v. IrwinWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Moore v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API