McCroskey v. Ladd
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Benito County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Harrison, J.—
The plaintiff made an agreement in writing with the defendants and two others on the 25th of August, 1887, to sell and convey to them certain real estate in Hollister for the sum of $6,500, of which $650 was to be paid at that date, and the balance within sixty *457days thereafter. The agreement also contained the following clause: “And said McOroskey, upon receiving said payments, agrees to make a deed of said property to said persons, and convey title to said premises to them, and if said persons fail to make said payments as herein named, they shall forfeit all right to said…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Eddy v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Beecher v. . ConradtNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
- Glassell v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Smith v. McCluskeyNew York Supreme Court · 1866
- Thomson v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Suburban Homes Co. v. NorthMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- Hogan v. KyleWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Russ Lumber & Mill Co. v. Muscupiabe Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Brooke v. StruthersMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.