Legal Opinion

F. Lunning, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 5, 1957No. C. D. 1941PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JohnsoN, Judge:

The merchandise involved in this case consists of decorated porcelain vases imported from Denmark in January and May of 1950, which were assessed with duty at 45 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 212 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, and the President’s proclamation of May 4, 1948, T. D. 51909, as decorated chinaware, not tableware, not containing 25 per centum or more of calcined bone. It is claimed in the original protests that the merchandise is properly dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. United States v. DowningCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  3. Petry Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  4. United States v. Baumgarten & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. Stern v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ebeling & Reuss Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  2. Keepnews Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  3. F. Lunning, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  4. Keepnews Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  5. Zacho v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API