Ebeling & Reuss Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Olivee, Chief Judge:
This protest has been limited to certain items that were classified under the general provision in paragraph 218 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, for—
* * * all articles of every description not specially provided for, composed wholly or in chief value of glass, blown or partly blown in the mold or otherwise, or colored, cut, engraved, etched, frosted, gilded, ground (except such grinding as is necessary for fitting stoppers or for purposes other than ornamentation), painted, printed in any manner, sand-blasted, silvered, stained, or decorated or *388ornamented in any…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. DowningCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- Petry Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
- F. Lunning, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fusek's v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- Hartman Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Keepnews Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Spiers v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- St. John v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.