Legal Opinion

United States v. Baumgarten & Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 22, 1911No. 687PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 25440 (T. D. 31543).

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge

Under the tariff act of 1909 the appellees imported into this country a carved marble vase, which is a copy of one of the vases in the Bor-ghese collection at .Home.

Duty was assessed upon the article by the collector at the rate of 50 per cent ad valorem as “marble manufactured into a vase,” under the provisions of paragraph 112 of the act, which reads as follows:

112. Marble, breccia, onyx, alabaster, and jet, wholly or partly manufactured into monuments, benches, vases, and other articles, or of which these substances or either of them is the component material of chief value, and all…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tutton v. VitiSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. OlivottiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. United States v. DowningCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  3. Stern v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. F. Lunning, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  5. Reardon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API