Legal Opinion

Stern v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 1, 1912No. 663PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 25180 (T. D. 31450).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

Appeal from a decision of the Board of General Appraisers involving the dutiable classification of a variety of stone jardinieres, vases, and figures.

The case involves the application of a very narrow line of distinction between wbat does and does not constitute a sculpture, as that term is used and modified in paragraph 470 of the tariff act of 1909.

The board, as to the merchandise the subject of this appeal, which was but part of that covered by the invoice, overruled the protest of the importers.

While a number of such articles are the subject of this appeal, those concerning which, in our…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lazarus, Rosenfeld & Lehmann v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  2. United States v. Baumgarten & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. Tutton v. VitiSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  2. United States v. OlivottiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  3. United States v. DowningCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  4. F. Lunning, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  5. Downing v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API