Legal Opinion

United States v. Downing

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 21, 1916No. 1591PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7747 (T. D. 35564).

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

As stated in the opinion of the Board of General Appraisers the entire. importation here in question is described in the invoice as follows:

Stone round temple “ Palladio ” of the seventeenth century.

Stone ring.

Iron dome in three parts for the temple.

Round marble table.

At the beginning of the hearing before the board all claims upon the last three mentioned items or parts of the temple were abandoned, the reason for which, as stated by importers here, was that their expert witness was of opinion that the stone ring, the iron dome, and round marble table were new parts, and the record seems to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Benziger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. United States v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Lazarus, Rosenfeld & Lehmann v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. United States v. Baumgarten & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. Merritt v. TiffanySupreme Court of the United States · 1889

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  2. Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  3. United States v. OlivottiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  4. Frei Art Glass Co. v. UnitedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  5. Petry Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API