Legal Opinion

State v. Westall

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 18, 1994No. 9329SC1070PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Defendant contends the trial court erred by submitting the charge of robbery with a dangerous weapon to the jury, in its rulings with respect to the admission of certain evidence, in its instructions to the jury, and by sentencing defendant to the maximum term of imprisonment allowed by law. We find no prejudicial error in defendant’s trial.

I

Defendant’s first assignment of error results from his claim that the pellet gun used in the robbery cannot be considered a dangerous weapon. G.S. § 14-87(a) defines the offense of robbery with a dangerous weapon as the unlawful taking, or…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. State v. LawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. RiddickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. McLaughlin v. North CarolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Chamberlain v. ThamesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  3. State v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Norvil v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  5. State v. BallardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API