Legal Opinion

Chamberlain v. Thames

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 29, 1998No. COA97-943PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Judge.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in the admission of hearsay evidence by (I) allowing a medical expert to testify about the findings and opinions of a non-testifying medical expert; (II) allowing plaintiff to testify to what she was told by her non-testifying physician; (III) allowing the admission of certain medical bills and records; and (IV) denying his motion for a new trial.

I

At trial, Dr. Loehr testified by videotaped deposition about his course of treatment for plaintiff. He also testified over objection about the findings of Dr. Donna Maneice (Dr. Maneice), a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Sims ex rel. Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  5. Guyther v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gorostieta v. ParkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Forster v. West Dakota Veterinary Clinic, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. BerrymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  4. In re S.W.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. Floyd v. McGillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API