Legal Opinion

State v. Ballard

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 2008No. COA08-196PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of second-degree murder. Defendant argues the trial court plainly erred in “failing to instruct the jury that if the [S]tate failed to prove any element of the charged offense, or any lesser included offense, it must find defendant not guilty[,]” and “denying the jury’s request for the testimony of three witnessesf,]” and erred in instructing the jury on flight. For the following reasons, we find no prejudicial error.

I. Background

The State’s evidence tended to show the following: Defendant and the victim lived together in a trailer…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. AnthonySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  3. State v. LevanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  4. State v. BurginSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. OliphantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. State v. LaneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  3. State v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. State v. AutryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API