State v. Ballard
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STROUD, Judge.
Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of second-degree murder. Defendant argues the trial court plainly erred in “failing to instruct the jury that if the [S]tate failed to prove any element of the charged offense, or any lesser included offense, it must find defendant not guilty[,]” and “denying the jury’s request for the testimony of three witnessesf,]” and erred in instructing the jury on flight. For the following reasons, we find no prejudicial error.
I. Background
The State’s evidence tended to show the following: Defendant and the victim lived together in a trailer…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. AnthonySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. LevanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. BurginSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. OliphantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. LaneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. AutryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. BellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.