Legal Opinion
In Re Robledo
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 6, 2000No. CX-99-2108PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge
On appeal from recommitment as a mentally ill person, Manuel Robledo contends that the district court violated Minn.Stat. § 253B.13, subd. 1 (1998), by allowing petitioners to use consecutive-recommitment procedures even though his original commitment had expired. Because the statutory procedures for consecutive recommitment require a new petition, hearing, and determination to be completed before the expiration of any existing commitment order, we reverse.
FACTS
Manuel Robledo was committed as a mentally ill person to the Minneapolis Veterans’ Affairs Medical Center and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- King v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- In Re BlodgettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- In Re BrownCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Maiers v. RoyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
- First National Bank v. Profit Pork, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.