Maiers v. Roy

OPINION

CONNOLLY, Judge.

Appellant challenges the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, arguing that he is being illegally imprisoned for violating the terms of his conditional release because his term of conditional release did not begin until after he completed his term of supervised release. Because conditional release begins when an offender is released from prison and appellant was on conditional release when he violated his conditional-release terms, we affirm.

FACTS

On June 19, 2007, appellant Charles Patrick Maiers was convicted of felony first-degree driving while impaired…