State v. Nelson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Appellant challenges his felony conviction of failing to provide care and support for his two minor children in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.375. Appellant argues that the district court (1) erred by interpreting the statute as providing that the state could obtain a conviction by proving only that he had failed to make court-ordered child-support payments and (2) abused its discretion by excluding evidence of his nonmonetary care for his children that he intended to offer as a defense to the charge against him. Because we conclude that the district court correctly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- ILHC OF EAGAN, LLC v. County of DakotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. FleckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- In Re RobledoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. WiltseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- John Mark Hentges v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014