Legal Opinion

State v. Nelson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 10, 2012No. A12-0071PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

Appellant challenges his felony conviction of failing to provide care and support for his two minor children in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.375. Appellant argues that the district court (1) erred by interpreting the statute as providing that the state could obtain a conviction by proving only that he had failed to make court-ordered child-support payments and (2) abused its discretion by excluding evidence of his nonmonetary care for his children that he intended to offer as a defense to the charge against him. Because we conclude that the district court correctly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. ILHC OF EAGAN, LLC v. County of DakotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. State v. FleckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. State v. BellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. In Re RobledoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  5. State v. WiltseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  2. John Mark Hentges v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  3. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API