Legal Opinion

State v. Wood

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 7, 2019No. A17-1853PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, Judge

In March 2016, Brett Michael Wood was arrested for driving while impaired. Law-enforcement officers did not read Wood the implied-consent advisory. Instead, the officers sought and obtained a search warrant that authorized the taking of a sample of Wood's blood. The officers executed the search warrant over Wood's objection. The district court denied Wood's motion to suppress evidence of the result of the blood test, and a jury found him guilty at trial.

On appeal, Wood argues that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence on the ground that he had a statutory right…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. King v. BurwellSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Colby Davis LaubSupreme Court of Iowa · 2024
  2. State of Iowa v. Colby Davis LaubSupreme Court of Iowa · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API