Legal Opinion

Mauchline v. State Insurance Fund

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 25, 1924No. Appeal, No. 26PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

This is a workman’s compensation case. The claimant, C. A. Mauchline, was and had been for some time employed as electrical engineer in the mine of the Shinn Coal Company, defendant, when, in February, 1922, he was forced to quit work because of ill health. He had been ailing for several months; at first his trouble seemed to be bronchitis but developed into a permanent condition of expansion of the lungs known as “emphysema,” which prevents a normal expulsion of the air. Claimant’s contention, sustained by the referee, compensation board and lower court, is that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kuca v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. McCauley v. Imperial Woolen Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Fink v. Sheldon Axle & Spring Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  4. Lane v. Horn & Hardart Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  5. Riley v. Carnegie Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Lacey v. Washburn & Williams Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Pawlosky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Madore v. New Departure Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  5. Plazak v. Allegheny Steel CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API