Legal Opinion

Hodgers-Durgin v. de la Vina

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 12, 1999No. 97-16449PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge RHOADES; Dissent by Judge SNEED.

RHOADES, District Judge:

I. Overview

Plaintiffs, suing on behalf of themselves and a class of persons, allege that the United States Border Patrol routinely stops Arizona motorists without reasonable suspicion, in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Plaintiffs have sued three supervisory officials of the Border Patrol.

Plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s denial of class certification and grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants. For the reasons stated below, we reverse in both respects and remand for further proceedings.

II.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brink v. First Credit ResourcesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1999
  2. Antenor v. D & S FARMSDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1999
  3. Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1999
  4. Hodgers-Durgin v. de la VinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Sarnelli v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API