Legal Opinion
Sarnelli v. United States
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided June 30, 1999No. CV-S-98-0891-HDM-RJJPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McKIBBEN, Chief Judge.
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is affirmed. The plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is denied. The defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgement is granted.
It is so ordered.
REPORT & RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
JOHNSTON, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter came before the Court for a hearing on Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (# 17) and Defendant’s Cross- Motion for Summary Judgment (# 18) on May 19, 1999. In addition to the arguments made by the parties at the hearing, the Court has considered Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rennie v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2002