Legal Opinion

Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Los Angeles Unified School District

District Court, C.D. California

Decided April 23, 1999No. CV 98-6154 LBG RZXPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION.

BAIRD, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION.

On June 2, 1998, the California electorate adopted Proposition 227, a state initiative that restricts the use of bilingual education in public schools to teach students that are limited in English proficiency. On July 30,1998, plaintiffs filed the instant suit that challenges the validity of the proposition on federal statutory grounds. Plaintiffs currently move to certify a class to include,

All current and future, public school children who are enrolled or who will be enrolled in the Los, Angeles…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Yousefi v. Lockheed Martin Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1999
  2. Cardamon v. Dominion Courtyard Villas CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. John Doe 1 v. Washington State Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API