Legal Opinion

Antenor v. D & S FARMS

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided February 7, 1999No. 90-868-Civ-DLGPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

TURNOFF, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Joint Motion for Summary Judgment (D.E.199). For the reasons stated below, this Court will deny Defendants’ Motion and enter factual findings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d).

Procedural Background

This action began almost nine years ago with a Complaint filed against two South Miami-Dade County farms — D & S Farms and Iori Farms, Inc. (collectively, “the growers”), Also named as defendants were the growers’ labor contractor, Virgil Turke, and Mr. Turke’s company, Ag-Tech Services,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lisa ASP & Paulette Mertes v. Milardo Photography, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
  2. Powell v. Carey International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
  3. Sejour v. Steven Davis Farms, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2014
  4. Martinez v. First Class Interiors of Naples, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API