Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Sweitzer

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 22, 2017No. 11ag/14PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, C.J.

Petitioner, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, acting through Bar Counsel, filed in this Court on May 21, 2014, a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action (the “Petition”) against Respondent, Philip James Sweitzer. Bar Counsel charged Respondent with engaging in “professional misconduct” within the scope of Maryland Rule 16-701(i) 1 leading to a violation of Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct (“MLRPC”) 8.4(b), (c), and (d). 2 Those charges arise from Respondent’s felony theft conviction in the Circuit Court for Howard County. Felony theft is a “serious crime”…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HodesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  4. Bar Ass'n of Balto. City v. SiegelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  2. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SteinhornCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ShulerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  4. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SacksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  5. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API