Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Blair

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 13, 2018No. 83ag/09PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.

This attorney discipline proceeding involves a lawyer who, in the words of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, "concocted and executed a scheme to launder drug proceeds that he obtained from a client." United States v. Blair , 661 F.3d 755 , 759 (4th Cir. 2011) (per curiam), cert. denied , 567 U.S. 905 , 132 S.Ct. 2740 , 183 L.Ed.2d 615 (2012). In its opinion disposing of the first appeal in the lawyer's criminal case, the Fourth Circuit set forth the facts underlying the lawyer's convictions for money laundering, witness tampering, making a false statement, and willful…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheinbeinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AllenbaughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. LangCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API