Legal Opinion

Masten v. Car & Foundry Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1898No. 2,303PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.

— A judgment by default for $2,000.00 was rendered May, 29, 1896, in favor of appellant, in the court below, against appellee. This occurred at the May term of the court. At the next term, on June *6348, 1896, appellee filed its written petition to vacate said judment, and with and as a part of the petition, filed the affidavit- of Wm, A. Ketcham, attorney of appellee, as to appellee’s excusable neglect, mistake, and inadvertence, and the affidavit of Henry F. Frazer, the cashier and acting general manager of the appellee, as to appellee’s having a meritorious defense fco the original cause of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Champ v. KendrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Brumbaugh v. StockmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Spaulding v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Moore v. HornerIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bussiere's Admisnistrator v. SaymanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  2. Masten v. Indiana Car & Foundry Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Kurtz v. PhillipsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Foote v. FooteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. O'Neil v. HudsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API