Legal Opinion

Bussiere's Admisnistrator v. Sayman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 2, 1914PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — HonJ James E. Withrow, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtFabis, J.

This case comes to upon the certificate of the St. Louis Courtof Appeals, for the reason *305that in the opinion of that conrt the conclusion reached by it herein, while following this court, is in conflict with the opinion of the Kansas City Court of Appeals in the case of Miller v. Crawford, 140 Mo. App. 711. The facts and the point first mooted appear from the statement of the learned judge who wrote the opinion of the court, thus:

“This is an appeal from an order of the court setting aside a final judgment by default, and the immediate question for consideration pertains to the right of Appeal…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ewart v. PenistonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  2. McAllister v. KuhnSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Smoot v. JuddSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  4. Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  5. Crossland v. AdmireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Diekmann v. Associates Discount CorporationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Williams v. Kansas City Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  3. Audsley v. HaleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  4. Gosnell v. GosnellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. Farrell v. DeClueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API