Legal Opinion

Spaulding v. Thompson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1859PublishedCited by 21 opinions

APPEAL from the Marshall Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

The appellants recovered judgment against the appellees, in the Court below, by default, at the Octotober term, 1854. Afterwards, at the April term, 1855, Thompson filed his affidavit setting out, amongst other things, that previously to the default, he had employed an attorney to attend to and make defense to the action; that he implicitly relied upon the attorney to attend to the suit, wffio, for some reason unknown to the affiant, wholly neglected to attend to the same, -whereby judgment was rendered by default against him; and he prayed to be relieved from the. judgment thus taken, as it…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Moe v. KoeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Brumbaugh v. StockmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Anderson v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Moore v. HornerIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Jones v. LeechSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API