Legal Opinion

Brumbaugh v. Stockman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1882No. 9178PublishedCited by 29 opinions

From the Marshall Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

This was an action by the appellants .against the appellees upon a note given for a threshing machine.

The defendants pleaded payment and set-off.

The plaintiffs were defaulted for a failure to reply, and judgment was rendered for the defendant Stockman for $150 on ■the 14th of November, 1879.

At the next term of the court, on January 6th, 1880, the ■plaintiffs filed a written motion to set aside the default, and rtheir affidavit, stating that they employed North and Higbee *584as attorneys, who brought suit on the note in November, 1878;. that in December, 1878, Samson J. North, one…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Buck v. HavensIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Lake v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Nord v. MartyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Burnside v. EnnisIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Burr v. MendenhallIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Life Insurance v. LundquistIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Dobbins v. McNamaraIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Masten v. Indiana Car & Foundry Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Davis v. Steuben School TownshipIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Nash v. CarsIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API