Caldwell v. A.R.B., Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEST, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant, A.R.B., Inc. (A.R.B.) We must determine whether exceptions to the “going-and-coming” rule require reversal.
The Case
Plaintiff filed a complaint for damages against Bruce Wayne Brandon, charging him with negligently operating his vehicle and causing it to collide with plaintiff’s vehicle. The complaint further alleged that Brandon was acting in the scope of his employment. At the time of the accident, Brandon was employed by defendant A.R.B., and A.R.B. was named later as a defendant in the suit. A.R.B.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hinman v. Westinghouse Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Ducey v. Argo Sales Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Boynton v. McKalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Schreifer v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- General Insurance Co. of America v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Perez v. Van Groningen & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1986
- Antonio Williams v. Joseph Rene Esso Virgin Islands, Inc. Scott Drake John Doe, Third-Party Esso Virgin Islands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Hartline v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Blackman v. Great American First Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Felix v. AsaiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.