Perez v. Van Groningen & Sons, Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REYNOSO, J.
When a tractor operator is performing his normal task of disking, but has invited an unauthorized rider onto the tractor, is he still acting within the scope of employment? The answer is “yes.”
In this personal injury action, plaintiff Modesto Perez, the rider of the tractor, appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of defendant, Van Groningen & Sons, Inc. Perez contends that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury as a matter of law that Van Groningen’s employee, the tractor driver, was acting within the scope of his employment at the time of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Hinman v. Westinghouse Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Rodgers v. Kemper Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Carr v. Wm. C. Crowell Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by146 opinions
- Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Osborne v. LylesOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Lisa M. v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Farmers Insurance Group v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- John R. v. Oakland Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.