Legal Opinion

Roberts v. County of Mahoning

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 10, 2005No. 4:03 CV 2329PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

(Including Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law)

DOWD, District Judge.

I. Background 673

II. Findings of Fact

A. The Duties of the Defendants .

B. Experts.

C. Description of the Justice Center.

D. Description of the MSJ.

E. Status of Prisoners.

F. Variances.

G. Non-Compliance With the Variances.

H. Population Trends.

I. Staffing Levels at the Two Facilities .

J. Prior Litigation. 00

K. Financial Difficulties Facing Mahoning County. 00

L. Staffing Levels From Date This Action Was Filed (November 14, 2003) 00

M. Discipline Issues. 00

N. Lockdowns. 00

O. Lack of Training.

P. Security Breaches .

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Roberts v. COUNTY OF MAHONING, OHIODistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
  2. Roberts v. County of MahoningDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
  3. Roberts v. Mahoning CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
  4. Roberts v. Mahoning CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
  5. Burrell v. County of MahoningDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API