Legal Opinion
Roberts v. Mahoning County
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 17, 2007No. 4:03 CV 2329PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
CONSENT JUDGMENT ENTRY WITH A STIPULATED POPULATION ORDER
2Per curiam
1. This action was commenced on November 14, 2003 by Nathaniel Roberts, James Joseph Mancini, Joshua Baird, Kevin Whitacker, Mike Hamad, Rodney Gray, Leland Scott and Maurice Barnes as named Plaintiffs on behalf of all persons who are or who will be confined at the Mahoning County Justice Center.
■ 2. Plaintiffs alleged in their complaint that conditions at the Justice Center violated the United States Constitution, the Ohio Constitution, Statutory Laws of the State of Ohio, and rules and regulations promulgated by the Ohio Department of…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Roberts v. County of MahoningDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
- Roberts v. COUNTY OF MAHONING, OHIODistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
- Roberts v. County of MahoningDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
- Roberts v. MAHONING COUNTYDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Coleman v. SchwarzeneggerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009