Legal Opinion
Roberts v. Mahoning County
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 7, 2006No. 4:03 CV 2329PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
On August 28, 2006, the three-judge court convened a status conference and a hearing on the record to begin to address the question of whether a prisoner release order, as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 3626(a)(3), is required and permitted as a remedy in this case. As a result of those proceedings, the Court hereby issues the following order and case management plan.
I. BACKGROUND
By Memorandum Opinion and Order dated March 10, 2005, Judge Dowd, who presided over the bench trial conducted in December 2004, found in favor of the plaintiffs. See Doe. No. 93, 2005 WL 5569487, 495 F.Supp.2d 670,…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- William Toth v. Grand Trunk Railroad, D/B/A Cn North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Morales Feliciano,et v. John A. RullanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Laaman v. Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Roberts v. County of MahoningDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
- Roberts v. County of MahoningDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
4Cited by1 opinion
- Roberts v. Mahoning CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007