Legal Opinion

Sinnock v. Zimmerman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1929PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover the reasonable value of services alleged to have been performed between May 1, 1926, and June 15, 1927. The complaint alleges that the services were of the reasonable value of $500 per month and that these services were in part performed for defendant’s intestate and in part for defendant as administrator of intestate’s estate. Plaintiff’s services were performed while decedent and his administrator were performing a contract which decedent had entered into with the Long Bell Lumber company by the terms of which decedent had contracted to grade about…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. West v. EleyOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Inland Construction Co. v. City of PendletonOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Hill v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Chamberlain v. TownsendOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Tharp v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kashmir Corp. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. United States Potash Co. v. McNuttCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  3. McKee v. Capitol Dairies, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1940
  4. McGilchrist v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  5. King v. All Pro Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API