Legal Opinion

Inland Construction Co. v. City of Pendleton

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1925PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This cause, which was tried before the court without a jury, may well be considered thus: (1) Did plaintiff select a proper legal theory upon which to recover, and (2) if so, is there any evidence tending to establish such theory? It is conceded that plaintiff constructed the sewage disposal plant in compliance with the terms of its contract, with the exception of not completing it within the stipulated time. Under such circumstances, where nothing remains to be done except payment for the work performed, plaintiff, at his election, may declare specially on the original contract or generally…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Christie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Burgess v. HelmNevada Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Jefferson Hotel Co. v. BrumbaughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1909

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Wunderlich v. State of California Ex Rel. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. City of Dallas v. ShortallTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  3. ASHTON COMPANY, INC., CONTR. & ENG'RS v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Knox v. KnoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  5. McKee v. Capitol Dairies, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1940

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API