Legal Opinion

King v. All Pro Services, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 19, 1993No. 910402039; CA A74657PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendant, All Pro Services, Inc. (All Pro), after a jury trial on claims for wages due, quantum meruit and money had and received. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Through 1990, plaintiff was a consultant in the janitorial services business. His clients included New Life Systems, Inc. (New Life), ajanitorial services firm. New Life’s principal owner was Alan Wickerstrand. In September 1990, plaintiff, Wickerstrand and another businessman, Art Dixon, discussed a plan to form a new janitorial services firm, ultimately named All Pro.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. Tidewater Barge Lines, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Marquam Investment Corp. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. Kashmir Corp. v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Hill v. GarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Moini v. HewesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Safeport, Inc. v. Equipment Roundup & Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Wooton v. Viking Distributing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. A-C Construction, Inc. v. Bakke Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Ross v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. Sullivan v. Oregon Landmark-One, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API