Legal Opinion

Kashmir Corp. v. Patterson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 5, 1979No. 101,896, CA 12100PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a verdict in favor of defendants on their counterclaims. There are three assignments of error. Defendants cross-appeal alleging ;hat the trial court’s award of attorney fees was inadequate.

In 1976, defendants and plaintiff, a general contractor, entered into a contract under which plaintiff ¡vas to build a custom home for them. Under the terms >f the agreement plaintiff was to construct the resi-lence and defendants agreed to pay the cost of construction plus ten percent. Any costs incurred as the result of error or negligence on the part of the builders vere not to be…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Derenco, Inc. v. Benj. Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hansen v. Oregon-Wash. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Timber Access Industries Co. v. U. S. Plywood-Champion Papers, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State Highway Commission v. KendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Porter Construction Co. v. BerryOregon Supreme Court · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Boswell v. Zephyr Lines, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  2. Kashmir Corp. v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Ken Hood Construction Co. v. Pacific Coast Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. State v. BlakeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. L. H. Morris Electric, Inc. v. Hyundai Semiconductor America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API