West v. Eley
Oregon Supreme Court
From Umatilla: William It. Ellis, Judge. Action by Peter West against George and Andrew Eley, wherein an involuntary nonsuit was entered.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice W.olverton
The portion of the complaint material to the present controversy alleges “that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $60, upon an account for the services of the plaintiff as attorney for the defendants, rendered upon their retainer between the first day of March, 1894, and the first day of November, 1894, in prosecuting and defending certain suits and actions at their request, and for like services, at their request, in drawing, copying, and engrossing of divers court papers, and other attendances done and performed by the plaintiff in and about the business and suits of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sussdorff v. . SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Burgess v. HelmNevada Supreme Court · 1898
- Jenney Electric Co. v. BranhamIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Manning v. DallasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Hart v. HudsonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1857
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Shaw Wholesale Co. v. HackbarthOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Portland Iron Works v. WillettOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- McKee v. Capitol Dairies, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1940
- Inland Construction Co. v. City of PendletonOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Hill v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1928
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.