Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 29, 1987No. C1-86-1039, C8-86-1619PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Judge.
This appeal involves a discriminatory discharge claim brought by LaVonne *77Anderson against her former employer, Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co. (HKM). HKM appeals from the order denying its motion for a new trial, an order which let stand a $60,000 award to Anderson for damages she suffered when HKM discharged her for reasons related to her pregnancy, a violation of Minnesota’s Human Rights Act, Minn.Stat. § 363.03, subd. l(2)(b), (c), and subd. 1(5) (1982). HKM also appeals from the court’s award of nearly $60,000 to Anderson’s attorneys for their fees in prosecuting this…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ford Motor Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Steven G. Rothmeier v. Investment Advisers, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation Noel P. Rahn, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Rutherford v. County of KandiyohiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Hasnudeen v. Onan Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Sigurdson v. Isanti CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.