Legal Opinion
Rutherford v. County of Kandiyohi
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 19, 1989No. C7-89-1254PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIAM J. FLEMING, Judge.
John Rutherford appeals from a judgment dismissing all five of his causes of action against the respondents. We affirm.
FACTS
In May 1987, appellant John Rutherford brought suit against the respondents for their participation in discharging him from employment as a probation officer in Kandiyohi County. Rutherford’s termination letter stated:
The reasons for your termination are as follows:
1) You committed misconduct by representing the state of your health at the time of your application for the position of Probation Officer in January, 1981. At the time of that…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Frank L. LOEB, Plaintiff, v. TEXTRON, INC., Et Al., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lindgren v. Harmon Glass Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Ward v. Employee Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- LeBaron v. Minnesota Board of Public DefenseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Miller v. Centennial State BankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. Horseshoe Lake Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.