Legal Opinion
Hasnudeen v. Onan Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 20, 1995No. CX-94-2106PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*892OPINION
MARTIN J. MANSUR, Judge.
Appellants brought this suit alleging that respondent violated the Minnesota Human Rights Act by unlawfully discriminating against appellants. Appellants challenge the trial court’s denial of their posttrial motion for amended findings or for a new trial. Appellants argue that reversal is warranted because: (1) the trial court erroneously implemented a mixed motive analysis which appellants claim has been rejected by the Minnesota Supreme Court; (2) the trial court’s finding that appellants were not discriminated against is clearly erroneous; and (3) the trial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Sigurdson v. Isanti CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Steven G. Rothmeier v. Investment Advisers, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation Noel P. Rahn, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Hasnudeen v. Onan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Kennedy v. GN DANAVOXDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- LeBlond v. Greenball Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- Hasnudeen v. Onan Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.