Legal Opinion

Sigurdson v. Isanti County

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 22, 1989No. C2-88-1460PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT E. BOWEN, Acting Judge.

Appellant appeals from a judgment dismissing her claim for damages against respondents for discriminatory employment practices. The trial court concluded appellant’s damages claim was untimely. We reverse.

FACTS

This appeal arises out of a claim brought by appellant Renja Sigurdson against respondents Isanti County and certain county officials, alleging sex discrimination in employment practices. After two previous appeals, see Sigurdson v. Isanti County, 363 N.W.2d 476 (Minn.Ct.App.1985) and Sigurdson v. Isanti County, 386 N.W.2d 715 (Minn.1986), this court…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sigurdson v. Isanti CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. West Virginia Institute of Technology v. West Virginia Human Rights CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Musicland Group, Inc. v. Ceridian Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  4. New Hampshire Division of Human Services v. AllardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  5. Kalia v. St. Cloud State UniversityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API