Legal Opinion

Redelsperger v. City of Avondale

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 6, 2004No. 1 CA-CV 03-0309PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PORTLEY, J.

¶ 1 In this expedited appeal, we conclude that the approval of a conditional use permit is an administrative act and therefore not subject to the referendum power reserved to the citizens of a municipal corporation under Article 4, Part 1, Section 1(8), of the Arizona Constitution.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶2 On October 7, 2001, Timothy Redel-sperger applied to the City of Avondale’s Planning and Zoning Commission for a conditional use permit to construct a storage facility on property zoned C-2. 1 A majority of the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Johnston v. City of ClaremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Hernandez v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Bossert Corp. v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  5. Batty v. Arizona State Dental BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1941

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. Carrier v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Stop Exploiting Taxpayers v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  4. American Furniture v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  5. BROOM v. WILSON PAVING & EXCAVATING, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API