Legal Opinion

Rothenberg v. Metzger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 13, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

The respondent applied for an order correcting the appellant’s amended complaint and striking out portions thereof, and an order was made on February 7, 1929, granting inter alia his motion to strike out paragraph 12 and denying it as to paragraph 18 thereof. This order with notice of entry was served on February 11, 1929, and thereafter respondent served an answer. On March 8, 1929, respondent served a notice of appeal from so much of the order as denied his motion to. strike out paragraph 12 of the amended complaint. On March sixteenth he served an amended answer, and on March twenty-fifth…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vose v. ConklingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  2. Shipley v. SchmitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  3. 255 Fifth Ave. Corp. v. FreemanNew York Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Kent v. SibleyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1889

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Concer's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  2. People v. SchoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  3. Dobson v. MacomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  4. Mordkowitz v. MordkowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Broniszewski v. NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API