Mordkowitz v. Mordkowitz
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
This is an action for divorce. Defendant has interposed an answer containing, in addition to certain denials, two counterclaims. Plaintiff has served a reply to these counterclaims. By this motion, which invokes rules 90, 102, 103, subdivision 4 of 106 (I assume the movant intended rule 109, subd. 5) and 280 of the Rules of Civil Practice, plaintiff seeks to correct or dismiss the counterclaims as pleaded.
Defendant urges that the service of the reply to the counterclaims vitiates the motion. There is, however, no statement on record or proof as to when the reply was served. Under rule 90,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Goldberg v. . UtleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Grobman v. FreimanNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Drydock Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Queens Machine Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- O'Hara v. DerschugAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Rothenberg v. MetzgerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hewitt v. MaassNew York Supreme Court · 1964