255 Fifth Ave. Corp. v. Freeman
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBijub, J.
Three motions are made by defendants. The first, to vacate a judgment entered by plaintiff on defendants’ default in appearance; second, to compel the plaintiff to make the complaint more definite and certain, and the third, for an extension of time to answer. As my disposition of the first motion renders the latter two futile they need not be discussed. Defendants’ time to answer expired February 15, 1923.. No formal notice of appearance or pleading had been served by defendants up to that time. On the last day, however, defendants gave notice of their motion to make the complaint more…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Muslusky v. . Lehigh Valley Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shipley v. SchmitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Rothenberg v. MetzgerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Samuel S. Glauber, Inc. v. Lehigh Valley R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1934
- Hanes v. JohnsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1932
- Levin v. LevinNew York Supreme Court · 1935