Legal Opinion

Shipley v. Schmitzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1928PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Sections 278-283 of the Civil Practice Act relate solely to.motions formerly called demurrers. (255 Fifth Avenue Corporation v. Freeman, 120 Misc. 472.) Hence, section 282 of said act does not apply to a motion to dismiss a complaint made under rule 107, subdivision 6, and service of an answer to a complaint to which such a motion has been addressed would not be deemed an abandonment of such motion. Defendant does not, therefore, require an extension of time to answer pending an appeal from the order denying such motion. Present — Dowling, P. J.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. 255 Fifth Ave. Corp. v. FreemanNew York Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miller v. National City Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  2. Loehr v. East Side Omnibus Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  3. Rothenberg v. MetzgerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  4. Miller v. National City Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946
  5. Rathkopf v. WalkerNew York Supreme Court · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API