Maranville v. State Board of Equalization
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.
Plaintiff made X-ray pictures of parts of anatomies of patients, for the use of doctors and dentists. These pictures are called radiographs. Plaintiff took and developed radiographs, and made reports analyzing their meaning. He was what is termed a lay technician. He made no diagnoses from the radiographs. But he did advise the professional men of his conclusions of conditions of anatomies as they appeared to him in the pictures. He “interpreted light shadows. ’ ’ His reports were oral over the telephone, or in writing. He testified that he did not base his charges at the rate of so much per…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coca-Cola Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Barker Bros., Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- People v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Voss v. GrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
- People v. Puritan Ice Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. GrazerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People v. CantorAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1961